WAAAAYYYY TOO EARLY TOP 10

[Darth Backer]

The DLS game was embarrassing. I hope it motivated the guys coming back.

I'd argue that the DLS game wasn't a bit embarrassing for Clovis North because they got that far...

It was super embarrassing for the Central Section because no one could figure out how to defend them they way that DLS did.

All this spread offense has gotten everyone soft...

[TeddyKGB]

All this spread offense has gotten everyone soft...

This is absolutely the case. The thing I find funny is the inconsistency of coaches saying kids are soft and spoiled and then turn around and cater to them. You can't have a run heavy  offense because supposedly the "athletes" will leave.

[CWClassof2007]

Losing to De La Salle? What's that like?

[TeddyKGB]

Losing to De La Salle? What's that like?

my guess is that it's much like losing to The Bakersfield High Drillers at Griffith by way of a 38 yard FG as time expires.

[Raw Dawg Sports]

The rumor was that Jacot applied for the Liberty job + a few others. If that's the case, I wonder why he would want leave CN? 🤔

[izne1home]

my guess is that it's much like losing to The Bakersfield High Drillers at Griffith by way of a 38 yard FG as time expires.

No, losing to DLS is tough, but for most, expected.  All you can hope for is that you made them earn it.

Losing to BHS by a field goal is like this:

[CWClassof2007]

my guess is that it's much like losing to The Bakersfield High Drillers at Griffith by way of a 38 yard FG as time expires.

Wasn't on that team. Wouldn't know.

[hardhitter23]

I believe that a CE or even a Central would of matched up better than CN. You know like they say the right boxer or fitting their style. CN played into what DLS does. Where CE and Central would of also put them in space. I am not saying they would of won, but I think it would of been a different game than what North showed and the excuses they got for it. Everyone keeps saying beat up. Maybe I missed something because North could of lost to East twice , Central had them and CW the first time. The ball rolled in their favor and they took advantage of the situation.

[Darth Backer]

I believe that a CE or even a Central would of matched up better than CN. You know like they say the right boxer or fitting their style. CN played into what DLS does. Where CE and Central would of also put them in space. I am not saying they would of won, but I think it would of been a different game than what North showed and the excuses they got for it. Everyone keeps saying beat up. Maybe I missed something because North could of lost to East twice , Central had them and CW the first time. The ball rolled in their favor and they took advantage of the situation.

That's the nature of smashmouth football, a lot of low scoring tight games. Gotta play good defense since you're fresh after that offense took 12 plays to score. Games will stay close with the CN style but the better team at the tangibles typically wins: can you block and tackle?

I fully understand why spread is so popular, coaches believe they can make up for inadequecies in certain areas.

[izne1home]

That's the nature of smashmouth football, a lot of low scoring tight games. Gotta play good defense since you're fresh after that offense took 12 plays to score. Games will stay close with the CN style but the better team at the tangibles typically wins: can you block and tackle?

I fully understand why spread is so popular, coaches believe they can make up for inadequecies in certain areas.

Amen

[TeddyKGB]

I fully understand why spread is so popular, coaches believe they can make up for inadequecies in certain areas.

Its odd because I would think its exactly the opposite, in running the spread there are a couple things that it seems are musts: OL must be ale to pass protect tp protect the QB, QB & WRs must be able to read defense to recognize blitz and know who the hot route is. WRs have to be good route runners.

[izne1home]

Its odd because I would think its exactly the opposite, in running the spread there are a couple things that it seems are musts: OL must be ale to pass protect tp protect the QB, QB & WRs must be able to read defense to recognize blitz and know who the hot route is. WRs have to be good route runners.

I may have jumped the gun with my 'amen.'  I was thinking of the 3-Card Monte Wing T. 

[TeddyKGB]

I may have jumped the gun with my 'amen.'  I was thinking of the 3-Card Monte Wing T. 

There is nothing wrong with the Wing T

[Darth Backer]

Its odd because I would think its exactly the opposite, in running the spread there are a couple things that it seems are musts: OL must be ale to pass protect tp protect the QB, QB & WRs must be able to read defense to recognize blitz and know who the hot route is. WRs have to be good route runners.

Key words "coaches believe"

I don't think it's true. Sometimes after you have faced really high quality spread teams with great athletes, it's downright laughable with teams with no speed line up in spread.

[TeddyKGB]

Key words "coaches believe"

I don't think it's true. Sometimes after you have faced really high quality spread teams with great athletes, it's downright laughable with teams with no speed line up in spread.

you're right! It's borderline pathetic that coaches are so delusional as to believe that they can "coach up" kids with out the athleticism or speed...or a QB with an arm like a wet noddle... izne can relate to the uselessness of a wet noddle

[izne1home]

There is nothing wrong with the Wing T

Photo of Clovis East OC diagramming the double-wing outside a Tim Murphy seminar. 
.

[izne1home]